Skip to content

TNR’s Rebecca Traister: If you think that U.Va. rape didn’t happen, you don’t care about rape

December 4, 2014

Traister, in her inimitable prose style:

Rolling Stone Never Interviewed UVA Frat Bros Accused of Gang Rape

It’s a frat house–so it had to be the scene of a premeditated gang rape

It’s ironic and telling, though, that Erdely’s doubters have blown up their suspicions well beyond the available evidence, calling her story a “hoax” and comparing it to the fabricated pieces published by Stephen Glass in The New Republic and other magazines. It’s a massive leap in logic to move from a reasonable journalistic critique of Erdely’s reporting and disclosure practices to writing, as former George journalist Richard Bradley does in his blog post, “I’m not convinced that this gang rape actually happened.” It is symptomatic of exactly the patterns of incredulity and easy dismissal of rape accusations that keep many assaulted women and men from ever bringing their stories to authorities or to the public.


The dismantling of Erdely’s storyboth by anti-feminist agonistes and by those genuinely dismayed by possible journalistic errorwould mean that Jackie’s story of being beaten and raped by seven fraternity brothers will be dismissed, and that the reading public will be permitted to slip back into the comforting conviction that stories like Jackie’s aren’t real, that rapes like that don’t happen, that our system works, and that, of course, bitches lie.

What we will all be allowed to happily forget is that there are plenty of real stories of rape: of violent rape, frat house rape, gang rape, date rape; that most rape accusers do not lie and that in fact it’s quite likely, statistically, that Jackie herself did not lie. But the most serious thing that we’ll be allowed to forget is the very point of Erdely’s story, whatever its strengths or flaws may be determined to be: The system does not work.

Hmm, maybe what the dismantling of that Rolling Stone gang-rape story actually shows is that the system does work.

Maybe Jackie didn’t lie “statistically,” but maybe she lied in fact–or she was operating under some strange delusions. Maybe that’s something that her friends and university officials quickly figured out. Maybe everyone except writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely and her editors thought there was something odd about a tale of getting violently raped for three solid hours on top of a broken glass table at a “fraternity initiation” party that no one could document ever took place at a time of year when fraternity initiations don’t take place–and then being advised by friends not to call the police. Maybe Erdely and her editors were a little too eager to paint fraternity houses as dens of violent premeditated crime to which innocent young women were lured after being carefully groomed that they neglected to ascertain any corroboration of Jackie’s story. Maybe it’s telling that the police aren’t investigating this two-year-old alleged multiple felony because no witness has yet come forward to file a complaint–not Jackie, not her friends, not anybody.

So, according to Rebecca Traister, “the reading public will be permitted to slip back into the comforting conviction that stories like Jackie’s aren’t real.”

Well, at least into the comforting conviction that Jackie’s story wasn’t real.

Posted by Charlotte Allen


From → Uncategorized

  1. I’ve been watching this story intently since it was published. From the moment that I read it, I suspected that something was wrong. The details do not seem at all plausible. I’ve gathered my own reasoning on the topic here:

  2. Lastango permalink

    “…those genuinely dismayed by possible journalistic error…”

    That’s a quaint bit of framing. Myself, I’m genuinely dismayed by rape fraud, enabled by journalistic fraud.

  3. “But payback for being so public on a campus accustomed to silence was swift. This past spring, in separate incidents, both Emily Renda and Jackie were harassed outside bars on the Corner by men who recognized them from presentations and called them “cunt” and “feminazi bitch.” One flung a bottle at Jackie that broke on the side of her face, leaving a blood-red bruise around her eye.”

    Do you believe this?

    Maybe an NFL QB could throw a beer bottle hard enough to break it on somebody’s face, although I doubt it. However, the victim would have more than a bruise. The victim would be carried into the emergency room unconscious.

    Where were Rolling Stone editors? Any kind of due diligence would have caused this story to collapse like a souffle.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: