Skip to content

Amanda Marcotte twists herself into a pretzel over the Clinton Foundation’s Saudi money

March 12, 2015

My latest blog post for the Independent Women’s Forum:

Marcotte: I heart Hillary–and besides, the U.S. is a sexist country, too!

Marcotte’s latest contribution to Slate‘s XX Factor is titled “The Clinton Foundation Accepts Money From Countries That Mistreat Women. Is That Bad?”

And that answer to that question is: “What part of no don’t you understand?”

Also: “That’s Islamophobic!”

Here’s Marcotte:

“Anyone who writes about feminist issues has likely encountered what I like to call the ‘Islam gotcha.’ ‘How can you be focused on equal pay or reproductive rights,’ the line from conservative critics tends to go, ‘when women in Saudi Arabia aren’t even allowed to drive cars?’ Once the province of talk radio callers and Internet commenters, the Islam gotcha is now being rolled into a GOP talking point against Hillary Clinton, who is expected to spotlight feminist concerns in her 2016 campaign for president.

“Amy Chozick of the New York Times reports that Republicans are highlighting that the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation ‘has accepted tens of millions of dollars in donations from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Algeria and Brunei — all of which the State Department has faulted over their records on sex discrimination and other human-rights issues.’ Republicans are seizing on this issue in the hope of undermining Clinton’s reputation as an advocate for women and girls both at home and abroad.


“[W]omen are oppressed, to varying degrees, in every nation on the planet. If you can’t accept money from sexist nations, that would mean accepting no donations at all. Bill Clinton alluded to this struggle when defending the donations at a No Ceilings event on Saturday. ‘Do we agree with everything they do? No,’ Mr. Clinton told reporters. ‘You’ve got to decide when you do this work whether it will do more good than harm if someone helps you from another country.’ Accepting money from countries that ban women from driving is an easy call, and it is terrible that the Clinton Foundation didn’t make it. But what about countries that restrict access to reproductive health care or have insufficient maternity leave policies? The reason to take the money is to put it toward fixing some of these problems all over the world. It’s a compromise.”

Posted by Charlotte Allen

From → Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: