Skip to content

Die, white man: Dem progressive PAC asks straight white males not to run for public office

May 9, 2016

From my latest blog post for the Independent Women’s Forum:

Bernie bros: Progressive but too white and too male for some Dems


The Huffington Post reports:

A new political action committee has three simple words for ‘people in positions of privilege, specifically straight white men’ running for office: ‘Can you not?’

“Can You Not PAC was started ‘by white men, for white men’ and is dedicated to letting straight white dudes know that they’re not always the best candidates to run for office, especially in ‘progressive, urban districts.’

“’We challenge brogressives and others to reject any notion that they are uniquely qualified or positioned to seek political office in districts that don’t need them,’ the PAC’s site reads. ‘As well-represented white dudes, we feel it is our obligation to know when to shut up and Not.’”

The Can You Not website features of photo of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with her famous quotation: “People ask me sometimes, when — when do you think it will it be enough? When will there be enough women on the court? And my answer is when there are nine.”

And if that weren’t point-blank enough, the website declares:

“We plan to give a handful of Democratic endorsements and (dis)endorsements before the June primaries and November election. Our advisory board of progressive women, LGBTQ folks, and people of color are researching and reviewing all of the potential endorsements and will make final decisions on those candidates by June 2016. We are raising money with the intent of defeating mediocre white dudes and elevating some of the best underrepresented candidates of 2016.”

Slate in-house feminist Christina Cauterucci just loves Can You Not because:

“Women are better than men on the environment, better than men on incarceration reform, and better than men on issues of reproductive justice.”

Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Charlotte Allen

From → Uncategorized

  1. “Women are better than men on the environment, better than men on incarceration reform, and better than men on issues of reproductive justice.”

    What if it’s a man who identifies as a woman? Then is this trans-gender man better than non-trans-gender men on environment, etc? And conversely, are women who identify as men worse than women who identify as women? Just extending the illogic to see what happens.

  2. Kaiter Enless permalink

    For brief moment I actually thought this was a parody…

Leave a Reply to Barry Garelick Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: