Skip to content

Electoral College liberal debacle: “Hamilton Electors” go Aaron Burr on Hillary Clinton

December 20, 2016

From my latest blog post for the Independent Women’s Forum:

Hamiltonians in Pennsylvania hoping to sway electors to Clinton

Actually, the election was supposed to be over a month and a half ago, on Nov. 8. But supporters of losing Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton wouldn’t let go, and decided to turn the formality of the Electoral College’s ratification of the results into a second go-round. Hence, the “Hamilton Elector” campaign. The idea was that Alexander Hamilton had written in Federalist No. 68  that the College was supposed to be a body “of men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation.”

Perusing the Federalist Papers was undoubtedly a first-time experience for the diehard liberals in the Clinton camp. Usually it’s conservatives who champion the limited-government principles enunciated by Hamilton and his proto-Republican Party confreres John Madison and John Jay in those august pamphlets. But the austere Hamilton has been repackaged as an immigrant rap artist, so he’s now a formidable liberal icon. His supporters also now delicately glide over that sexist word “men” in Hamilton’s Federalist 68 as they’ve used his words to insinuate that the Electoral College’s job is to veto their states’ popular votes.

So indeed a record number of  electors went Full Hamilton and either voted or tried to vote against their states’ presidential choice. The only problem–oops!–is that all but two of them used their newfound claim of veto power to vote against Hillary Clinton–not exactly what the Hamilton Elector people had in mind.

Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Charlotte Allen


From → Uncategorized

One Comment
  1. Lastango permalink

    Progs are reading the Federalist Papers? Good God! Next they will study Madison’s Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, and order a copy of de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America.

    Soon after they will decide taxation without representation is tyranny, that tyranny is held off when the citizenry keeps & bears arms, and that said citizens have unalienable, personal rights secured by meaningful checks & balances. What then?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: